4 Ὑμεῖς ἐκ τοῦ Θεοῦ ἐστε, τεκνία, καὶ νενικήκατε αὐτούς, ὅτι μείζων ἐστὶν ὁ ἐν ὑμῖν ἢ ὁ ἐν τῷ κόσμῳ. 5 Αὐτοὶ ἐκ τοῦ κόσμου εἰσίν· διὰ τοῦτο ἐκ τοῦ κόσμου λαλοῦσιν, καὶ ὁ κόσμος αὐτῶν ἀκούει. 6 Ἡμεῖς ἐκ τοῦ Θεοῦ ἐσμεν· ὁ γινώσκων τὸν Θεὸν ἀκούει ἡμῶν· ὃς οὐκ ἔστιν ἐκ τοῦ Θεοῦ οὐκ ἀκούει ἡμῶν—ἐκ τούτου γινώσκομεν τὸ πνεῦμα τῆς ἀληθείας καὶ τὸ πνεῦμα τῆς πλάνης.
20 Ἐάν τις εἴπῃ ὅτι «Ἀγαπῶ τὸν Θεόν,» καὶ τὸν ἀδελφὸν αὐτοῦ μισεῖ,‡μισει f35 048 [74%] ¦ μιση ℵA,B [26%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU (The point of the argument hinges on the hating being fact, so the Indicative is correct.) ψεύστης ἐστίν. Ὁ γὰρ μὴ ἀγαπῶν τὸν ἀδελφὸν αὐτοῦ§αυτου rell ¦ — [1%] OC ὃν ἑώρακεν, τὸν Θεὸν ὃν οὐχ ἑώρακεν πῶς*πως f35 A,048 (95.8%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ ου ℵB (4.2%) NU δύναται ἀγαπᾶν; 21 Καί, ταύτην τὴν ἐντολὴν ἔχομεν ἀπ᾿ αὐτοῦ· ἵνα ὁ ἀγαπῶν τὸν Θεὸν ἀγαπᾷ καὶ τὸν ἀδελφὸν αὐτοῦ.
<- 1 John 31 John 5 ->- a γινωσκεται f35 [67%] RP,HF,CP ¦ γινωσκετε A,B,C [25%] OC,TR,NU ¦ γινωσκομεν ℵ [8%] (Since most versions are based on TR or NU, we are used to the 2nd person, which may have contributed to the use of this passage as a ‘litmus’ test for demonization.)
- b ομολογει f35 ℵ (73.5%) RP,HF,CP ¦ 1 τον A,B (24.2%) OC,TR,NU ¦ omit sentence [homoioteleuton] (2%) ¦ one other variant (0.2%)
- c χριστον f35 (91.4%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — A,B (6%) NU ¦ κυριον ℵ (alone) ¦ omit sentence [homoioteleuton] (2%) ¦ two other variants (0.4%)
- d εν σαρκι εληλυθοτα f35 ℵ (94.8%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — A,B (2.6%) NU ¦ omit sentence [homoioteleuton] (2%) ¦ three other variants (0.6%)
- e εκ rell ¦ — [30%]
- f ο θεος rell ¦ — [15%]
- g ηγαπησαμεν f35 A [98.2%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ ηγαπηκαμεν B [1.6%] NU ¦ ηγαπησεν ℵ
- h τετελειωμενη εστιν εν ημιν f35 (90.7%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ ~ 3412 A (7.9%) NU ¦ ~ 1342 ℵB (0.8%) ¦ three other variants (0.6%)
- i αν f35 ℵ,A [92.5%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ εαν B [7.5%] NU
- j ομολογηση rell ¦ ομολογησει [16%] ¦ ολολογη A [1%] ¦ ομολογει [1%]
- k αυτω f35 A [37%] OC,TR ¦ 1 μενει ℵB [63%] RP,HF,CP,NU (Since the repetition of the verb is unnecessary, does it become the harder reading?)
- l εχωμεν rell ¦ εχομεν ℵ [12%] ¦ σχωμεν [1%]
- m αυτον f35 [84%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — A,B [2.6%] NU ¦ τον θεον ℵ048 [13.4%]
- n πρωτος rell ¦ πρωτον [15%]
- o μισει f35 048 [74%] ¦ μιση ℵA,B [26%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU (The point of the argument hinges on the hating being fact, so the Indicative is correct.)
- p αυτου rell ¦ — [1%] OC
- q πως f35 A,048 (95.8%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ ου ℵB (4.2%) NU